Contribution share135 of the 582 commits landed on main during my tenure — 23%, third of seven contributors
Tracked issues127 distinct Linear IDs referenced in commit messages
PR shape111 of 143 merged inside 24 hours — small, single-purpose, reviewable
Largest single PR+10,756 lines / 164 files — the marketing site, from zero
Commits on main Pull requests opened
Jun 8 — 9 commits · 14 PRs Jun 15 — 10 commits · 11 PRs Jun 22 — 11 commits · 15 PRs Jun 29 — 12 commits · 9 PRs Jul 6 — 9 commits · 14 PRs Jul 13 — 21 commits · 19 PRs Jul 20 — 12 commits · 10 PRs Jul 27 — 19 commits · 21 PRs Aug 3 — 8 commits · 7 PRs Aug 10 — 8 commits · 7 PRs Aug 17 — 7 commits · 9 PRs Aug 24 — 9 commits · 7 PRs Jun 8Jun 15Jun 22Jun 29Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27Aug 3Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24
Week beginning, Mondays. Commit counts are squash-merge commits on main, so one commit is one reviewed unit of work; the finer-grained figure across all feature branches is 174.
The honest caveat, before anyone does the division. 143 pull requests and ~68,600 added lines in eleven and a half weeks reads as AI-assisted, and it partly is — Hgraph builds with Claude Code in the loop. The line count also includes generated output: Supabase and GraphQL codegen, lockfile churn, and a single 10,756-line marketing-site drop. The number worth judging me on is not the volume; it is what the changes were allowed to touch, which is what the rest of this page is about.
I have also left the review statistics off this page on purpose. GitHub will tell you I am listed as reviewer on 82 pull requests, but 80 of those are my own. The honest count of other engineers’ pull requests I formally reviewed is two. Reviewing other people’s code is the clearest gap in this record, and it is the first thing I want more of in my next role.